In just ten days as leader of the British royal family, he had already had to deal with demonstrations against the monarchy and threats from British Commonwealth countries wanting to become republics. Charles III sparked outrage from officials and speculation about his health after the image of his hands became a national issue.
According to the experts they consulted stadiumOne of the first tasks would be to contain the separatist buzz in Scotland and avoid a referendum on the reunification of Ireland. “If Scotland became independent under Charles, he would still be king. Robert Hazell, a professor at University College London, said:
Another concern will be the integrity of the Commonwealth, a federation of 56 states, 14 of which still have the House of Windsor as head of state. During her reign, the Queen developed friendly personal relationships with many leaders of the British Commonwealth, but Charles lacks the charisma and stature of his mother.
Republics
“Many Commonwealth countries have indicated that they intend to move towards having presidents as heads of state, including Australia,” said Robert Blackburn, professor of constitutional law at King’s College London.
Similar to Barbados, which became a republic last year, other Caribbean nations — such as Jamaica, Antigua and Barbuda — should follow suit.
According to Blackburn, the New Testament could provide the conditions for a reassessment of the modern monarchy around the world, perhaps even in Britain. “The behavior of Charles III will be a decisive factor in this,” he said.
“The basic principle of constitutional monarchy is the doctrine of ministerial responsibility, according to which the king follows ministerial advice. Therefore, it is necessary that he abstain from controversial speeches or actions, and he must obey directions as to the limits within which he can express his opinions.”
appearances
Experts believe the monarchy may not function as well as it did under Elizabeth II. She ruled for 70 years, and became the longest-reigning monarch in Britain’s history, loved and respected both within the UK and abroad. Occupying this void will not be easy.
Recent days have seen several anti-monarchy demonstrations, a harsh response from the police and criticism from activists. In London, Edinburgh and Oxford, some protesters were intimidated and some were arrested.
costs
To keep the monarchy relevant, Charles will also have to make adjustments not only to the institution’s traditional behavior, but also to cut expenses that burden taxpayers – especially in a time of economic crisis.
Analysts expect Charles to make the monarchy a smaller institution, and cut spending to reduce the number of senior royals. For Blackburn, the House of Windsor serves the function of being a symbol of the state, a unifying force, and a convenient process for legitimizing various forms of government business. “However, property in a democracy remains an anomaly.”
On the other hand, Hazel believes that the royal family represents stability, continuity and tradition, but that it must also accompany changes in society. The support of the monarchy has been strong and stable for a long time, even in difficult times. This scenario is likely to continue in this way.
Charles had already shown that he was aware of the need to keep the monarchy relevant, as he visited Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in the first week of his reign. He will find other ways to keep the monarchy relevant, and he will get help from Prince William and the younger generation.”
Information from the newspaper. State of Sao Paulo.
“Friendly zombie guru. Avid pop culture scholar. Freelance travel geek. Wannabe troublemaker. Coffee specialist.”
